Welfare system won't be simplified
Finland's plans for a basic income are far too complicated, the tabloid Ilta-Sanomat comments:
“Now the talk is of a minimum supplement of 550 euros per month, which corresponds to the current subsistence income. In addition recipients would be able to collect earnings-related unemployment benefit and housing subsidies. At some point the basic income would replace all tax-financed social benefits, but in the experiment automatic social benefits [such as child allowance] and means-tested benefits are all mixed up together. … The problem is simple. There is not enough money to finance a universal basic income that replaces all social benefits. … A partial basic income won't simplify the system but threatens only to make it even more complicated - which deprives its advocates of their principal argument.”
Don't expect too much
The liberal daily Aamulehti welcomes the basic income experiment but warns readers not to expect too much:
“The basic income is not a cure-all solution, but if the system can be reformed in such a way that it encourages people to work, shortens periods of unemployment and makes administration more efficient we're headed in the right direction. ... However, the experiment is too short-term to truly determine what impact the partial basic income would have on the labour market. There will be a long way to go between the test and the actual introduction of a basic income in Finland.”