Is antisemitism becoming socially acceptable again?
Hate posters at demonstrations, arson in the Jewish section of Vienna's main cemetery, an attack on a synagogue in Berlin, anti-Jewish riots in the Russian republic of Dagestan: since Hamas's terrorist attacks on Israel and the ensuing war in Gaza, antisemitic incidents are on the rise. Commentators discuss appropriate reactions on the part of political leaders and society.
Reflect on core values
Le Monde appeals to French society:
“France is home to the largest Jewish community in Europe and - after Israel and the US - the third largest in the world. Jews are part of French identity and history. It is unacceptable that a section of the French nation, whatever its origin or religion, should be the target of regular hate campaigns and have to live in fear. With around 500 arrests since 7 October, the authorities have shown that they are reacting vigorously to the new wave of antisemitic acts. Now it is up to French society as a whole to return to its fundamental values and to remind people - in particular through education - that antisemitism and racism are unacceptable.”
Humanity's inviolable dignity
In view of the growing antisemitism in Denmark, the Nordschleswiger demands:
“We should never forget what populism from the right and left wants us to forget: there must be taboos, even - and especially - in a free society! While we protect freedom of opinion and speech, we must be careful that it is not exploited to undermine our principle of the inviolable dignity and freedom of all. In other words, just because you believe you are in the right does not give you the right to take out your anger over injustices on innocent people. ... Those who intimidate members of minorities attack us all.”
Nothing but empty words
Germany must translate its high-sounding words into action, the Neue Zürcher Zeitung demands:
“A 'zero-tolerance strategy' will be used to counter the 'abhorrent and inhuman antisemitism on German streets', says the social democratic Chancellor Olaf Scholz. ... Rarely have words meant as little as they do these days. In Essen, Düsseldorf, Münster, Bremen, Stuttgart, Berlin and elsewhere there were anti-Israeli rallies with tens of thousands of participants at the weekend. Organisations affiliated with the banned Islamist Hizb-ut-Tahrir movement called for the establishment of a 'caliphate' on German soil.”
Dangerous surge in online hatred
Dagens Nyheter sheds light on the role of social media:
“The antisemitic upswing in recent weeks is also part of a longer trend: since Elon Musk took over X, formerly Twitter, there has been a dramatic increase in open hatred against Jews on the platform. Earlier this autumn, antisemitism on the service escalated further after Musk directly encouraged it. ... At the same time, a new political science study shows that hatred of Jews and hatred of Muslims on alternative social media are widespread in the same right-wing and far-right circles.”
Virulent hatred of Jews
The arson attack in the Jewish section of Vienna's main cemetery is the manifestation of widely held views in Austria, writes Der Standard:
“This attack and many other recent incidents prove that plenty of people in this country have space in their brains for antisemitism. ... This act clearly signals hatred of Jews, and of a rather virulent strain. In 2022, a major study commissioned by the Austrian parliament found that more than 30 percent were of the opinion that Jews had too much influence in the international business world or that they were exploiting the Holocaust.”
Divided sympathies like in Soviet times
In a Telegram post picked up by Echo, political scientist Alexei Makarkin sees old patterns making themselves felt again in Russia:
“It is mainly the West-leaning section of the metropolitan population that harbours pro-Israeli sympathies. Many of them see Israel as a modern, highly developed democratic country surrounded by authoritarian regimes. ... Muslims sympathised with the Palestinians from the beginning. But then older anti-West Russians who devoutly condemned 'Israeli militarism' in Soviet times quickly joined the ranks of the sympathisers. For them, Israel is part of the hostile West - and the Palestinians are potential allies.”
A many-headed monster
The current bout of antisemitism is a many-headed monster, warns La Stampa:
“The embers smouldering under the ashes are ready to be rekindled. And not just metaphorically. ... Since October 7 the Christian brand of antisemitism has been fuelled by an imported antisemitism of Arab-Muslim origin, which in turn is reinforced by a right-wing political anti-Semitism that since the pandemic and its conspiracy offshoots (see QAnon and its followers) has been amplified in the social media echo chambers of the anti-vaxxer galaxy. And as if all that wasn't bad enough, now we have Israel's extremely harsh reaction to the Hamas attacks. Et voilà, the fire is blazing.”
The errors of the progressives
Tages-Anzeiger takes a look at certain sections of the academic left:
“In the 1970s, it was Ulrike Meinhof who provided the student milieu with the twisted rationale that allowed them to portray the RAF terror as legitimate counter-violence. Today, [Judith] Butler is providing the arguments for a new antisemitism in whose name the most heinous crimes are not only legitimised but also defended. ... Meanwhile, Muslims are suddenly perceived as the 'new Jews' who face the threat of widespread 'Islamophobia'. Moreover, since Israel is seen as a Western imperialist bridgehead in the Middle East, violence against Jews is always interpreted as a reaction to this political situation.”
Peace demonstrators in the worst company
People should be careful about who they demonstrate with, urges Corriere della Sera:
“It is true that not all pro-Palestinian demonstrators are antisemites. But it is also true that today all antisemites are for Palestine. This is their chance. Those who have filled the streets of Italian and European cities motivated by a sincere desire for justice and peace should bear this in mind. Not only because they might find themselves in the worst possible company. ... But above all, so that they are clear about in which direction their proximity to these people takes them; people who do not care about the desire for peace and justice, but who want to abuse it to take the world back to the darkest years of the 20th century.”